Street Liftings https://www.streetliftings.com Tue, 20 Oct 2026 22:14:21 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://www.streetliftings.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/cropped-STREET-LIFTINGS-500-x-500-px-1-32x32.png Street Liftings https://www.streetliftings.com 32 32 How Many Pull Ups a Day? The Weekly Dose That Actually Builds Reps https://www.streetliftings.com/how-many-pull-ups-a-day/ Tue, 20 Oct 2026 22:14:21 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/how-many-pull-ups-a-day/
How Many Pull Ups a Day? The Weekly Dose That Actually Builds Reps

How many pull ups a day should you do? It is the most common question in the gym, and it stalls more lifters than any other, because the unit is wrong. Your back does not respond to a daily number. It responds to a weekly dose of hard sets, spread across a few days, with enough recovery in between. You can grind 30 reps every morning and sit at the same max for six months, or do 60 well placed reps a week and add three reps in a month. Here is how to calculate your dose instead of guessing it.

How Many Pull Ups a Day: You Are Counting the Wrong Unit

Volume research never counts daily reps. It counts sets per muscle group per week. The meta-analysis by Schoenfeld, Ogborn and Krieger, pooling 34 treatment groups from 15 studies, found a clear dose-response: each additional weekly set was associated with 0.37 percent more muscle gain, and the gap between high-volume and low-volume protocols reached 3.9 percentage points (Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017).

Second piece: how you spread it. In the same research group, at equal weekly volume, splitting the work across two sessions beat a single session, effect size 0.49 against 0.30. A 2025 meta-regression in Sports Medicine covering 67 studies and 2,058 participants sharpens that picture: once weekly volume is set, frequency barely moves muscle size, but it keeps paying off for strength. The pull-up, in streetlifting, is a strength lift first. So: two to four sessions a week, not one, and definitely not seven.

Practical translation: drop the daily number and aim for 10 to 20 vertical pulling sets per week, spread over two to four days. Everything after that is execution, and it is laid out in the guide to progressing at pull-ups.

How Many Pull Ups a Week by Level

This table gives you the weekly dose, how many sessions to split it into, and the daily equivalent if you really insist on thinking per day. That equivalent is an average, not an instruction: you do nothing on rest days.

Level Max in one set Sets per week Sessions Daily equivalent
Beginner 0 to 4 12 to 16 short sets 3 6 to 10 reps
Intermediate 5 to 11 12 to 18 3 10 to 16 reps
Advanced 12 and up 10 to 16 2 to 3 14 to 20 reps
Weighted 5 reps at +45 lb (20 kg) 9 to 14 2 to 3 8 to 12 reps

Notice the volume drops as the level goes up. That is normal: the stronger you get, the more each set costs you. One set at +55 lb (25 kg) buys a lot more fatigue than ten bodyweight reps. How those sessions fit into a training week is covered in structuring your streetlifting training.

What Actually Counts as a Set

A set that counts is a set taken close to failure, through a full range, arms locked out at the bottom and chin clearly over the bar. Sloppy half reps inflate your counter and build nothing. The meta-regression by Robinson and colleagues, published in Sports Medicine in 2024, points the same way: muscle size increases as sets are terminated closer to failure, while strength gains hold up across a wide range of repetitions in reserve. So keep one to three reps in reserve on most sets, and save true failure for the last set of a movement, not every set.

The 100 Pull Ups a Day Challenge and What It Really Costs

The challenge works, for three to six weeks. Your coordination sharpens, your grip toughens, your reps clean up. Then the elbow starts barking, the shoulder catches, and the numbers drop faster than they climbed.

The problem is not the number, it is the jump. One hundred reps a day is 700 reps a week. If you did 150 the week before, you just multiplied your load by more than four overnight. Tim Gabbett’s work on training load is blunt about that: when weekly load rises 15 percent or more above the previous week, injury risk climbs into the 21 to 49 percent range, while it stays under 10 percent as long as the change sits between minus 5 and plus 10 percent (British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016).

If you like the daily format anyway, keep the format and cut the dose: very short sets, far from failure, three or four reps each time you walk under the bar, several times a day. You keep the groove without digging a hole. It stays a supplement, not a program. The technical standard you are grooving is spelled out in the complete pull-up guide.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Muscles Worked by Pull-Ups and How Fast They Recover

The pull-up hits the lats and teres major, the lower traps and rhomboids that control the shoulder blade, the biceps and brachialis at the elbow, the forearms holding the bar, and the trunk keeping you from swinging. All of that overlaps heavily with your horizontal pulling: if you row twice a week on top, those sets belong in your weekly count too.

These tissues do not recover at the same speed. The back takes a beating well. The elbow flexors and the forearm tendons do not, and they are what gives out first when you stack reps every single day. Two simple rules: 48 hours between hard sessions on the same pulling pattern, and switch to a neutral or supinated grip when a strict pronated grip starts lighting up your elbow. Where that goes wrong under load is detailed in weighted pull-ups, dangerous or not.

When to Stop Counting Reps and Start Counting Pounds

Past 12 to 15 strict reps, adding more reps mostly buys muscular endurance. If strength is the goal, the dial changes: you add weight and drop back into the 3 to 6 rep range. That is the whole point of weighted work, and it is the moment your weekly volume goes down while intensity goes up.

At that stage the question is no longer how many pull ups a day, it is how many heavy sets a week and how fast the load climbs. That is what the weighted pull-up program drives, while the weighted dip program handles the pressing side and the muscle-up program turns that pulling strength into a full movement.

Your Four-Week Plan

  1. Week 1, measure. One max set through a full range, warm but fresh, on Monday. Write the number down. It is your baseline and you will not retest it for four weeks.
  2. Week 1, set the dose. Three sessions spaced 48 hours apart, four sets each, at 60 percent of your max per set. A 10-rep max means four sets of 6, so 12 sets on the week.
  3. Weeks 2 and 3, climb slowly. Add one set per week, or one rep per set, never both at once. That keeps you under the 10 percent weekly increase.
  4. Week 4, back off then test. Two easy sessions early in the week at half the sets, then a fresh max test on Friday.

The four mistakes that cost the most: counting half reps instead of full sets; adding volume on a day you are fried because the plan said so; doing pull-ups every day and hoping frequency replaces intensity; keeping the same dose all year when your max has moved. Retest your max every four to six weeks and rebuild the dose from the new number.

Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it:

mathieu

mathieu

Street workout athlete since 2019, I discovered streetlifting in 2023. Today I share my passion for the sport through streetliftings.com.

]]>
Lever Belt vs Prong Belt: Which One Should You Buy? https://www.streetliftings.com/lever-belt/ Wed, 14 Oct 2026 22:11:54 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/lever-belt/
Lever Belt vs Prong Belt: Which One Should You Buy?

A lever belt locks shut in one flick and pops open just as fast. A prong belt threads through a hole, like a very thick dress belt. Under a heavy bar, both do the same job, and both are legal in competition. What changes is everything that happens between your sets. Here is the honest breakdown, and which one belongs in your gym bag.

Lever belt vs prong belt: what actually changes

Support is not the differentiator. At the same thickness and width, a lever belt and a prong belt are the same slab of stiff leather wrapped around your trunk. The buckle is what separates them, and the buckle decides how you use the belt week after week.

On a prong belt, a metal tongue drops into a punched hole. You pick the hole, you cinch, you go. No moving parts, adjustable on the spot, within the holes the maker gave you.

On a lever belt, the buckle is bolted to one fixed position on the leather. You flip the lever, a cam locks it down, and the tightness is identical to your last set. To change that tightness, you unscrew the lever and move it to a different set of holes, which means grabbing a screwdriver. That is the whole trade: speed on one side, adjustability on the other.

If you are still not sure a belt belongs in your training at all, read our take on whether you actually need a squat belt before you shop for buckles.

The lever belt: identical tightness on every set

What you gain

Repeatability. Once the lever sits at the right notch, every close gives you the exact same compression. You stop wondering whether you were on the fourth or the fifth hole during your warm-up. Across a heavy squat session of six to eight working sets, that is one less variable to manage.

Then there is the release. After a double at 90 percent, you want to breathe. A lever opens with a thumb flick, while a prong needs a hard pull on the strap to free the tongue. Lifters who like a brutally tight belt also get more compression out of a lever, because the cam gives you mechanical advantage as it closes.

What you give up

Flexibility. If you want the belt looser for deadlifts than for squats, you need a screwdriver between exercises, and nobody does that. You also give up tolerance for bodyweight swings. Gain or drop seven or eight pounds (3 to 4 kg), eat a big pre-workout meal, start a cut, and your setting is suddenly wrong.

Last thing: a lever is a mechanical part. The screws back out over time. A quick tighten every few weeks is part of owning one, same as conditioning the leather.

The prong belt: single, double, and fine adjustment

The prong wins everything the lever loses. One hole tighter for your top sets, one hole looser for volume, adjusted with no tools in the middle of a session. That is the logical pick if your bodyweight moves, if you use the belt across several exercises, or if you share it with a training partner.

Then you choose how many tongues. Single prong is the common option: faster to fasten, cheaper, and plenty strong. Double prong spreads the load across two points instead of one, which slows down the leather stretching around the holes over the years, but it costs you a few seconds every time you line up two tongues in two holes.

For most lifters, single prong is the right answer. Double prong earns its keep only if you plan on years of very heavy work and want to protect the leather. For specific models and build quality, see our lifting belt buying guide.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Lever vs prong: the comparison table

Criterion Lever belt Prong belt
Closing One flick, cam lock Tongue in a hole, then cinch
Resizing Screwdriver required No tools, hole by hole
Opening between sets Instant Stiffer, needs a firm pull
Maximum tightness Higher High, limited by hand strength
Changing bodyweight Poor fit Handles it easily
Moving parts Lever and screws to check None
Price Roughly 20 to 30 dollars more The cheaper of the two
Best for One use case, stable weight Multiple uses, variable weight

What the IPF rulebook allows

Good news: both are legal. The International Powerlifting Federation technical rules, section 3.6, state that the belt may have a buckle with one or two prongs or of the “quick release” type, and the rulebook spells out that quick release means lever. Neither buckle gets an edge from the rules.

The dimensions are where the rules bite. Belt width tops out at 10 cm (about 4 inches), thickness at 13 mm (roughly half an inch) along the main length, and the buckle at 13 cm on the outside. The body must be leather, vinyl or a similar non-stretch material, with no padding, bracing or hidden supports inside the laminations. All of it is checkable in the IPF technical rulebook effective March 1, 2026.

Streetlifting federations are stricter about where you can use it. Under the French FNSL rules revised on March 5, 2024, the belt is permitted on the squat only, with the same 13 mm ceiling. Your belt covers one of the four competition lifts, so size your budget accordingly.

On thickness, keep it simple. The 10 mm build is the default: stiff enough for almost everyone and far more comfortable. The 13 mm build suits very heavy lifters chasing maximum rigidity who accept a long, painful break-in period.

Which one to pick for your squat

Go lever if your bodyweight is stable, the belt only comes out for heavy squats, and you want identical tightness session after session. That is the competitor building toward a max over a training block, the way our squat strength program is laid out.

Go prong if you are bulking or cutting, if the belt sees several exercises, or if you are new to belts and have no idea yet how tight you like them. It is also the sane first belt: you learn your preferred setting before locking anything in place.

Keep the priorities straight, though. The belt touches one of the four streetlifting lifts. The other three are loaded with a dip belt, not a lifting belt, and the real progress comes from the weighted pull-up program, the weighted dip program and the weighted muscle-up program. No buckle has ever added pounds to a total on its own.

Mistakes to avoid with your lifting belt

  • Buying a lever before you know your setting. Start with a prong, log the hole you use for two months, then switch if you still want to.
  • Cranking it as tight as it goes. You need room to take a big belly breath and push out against the leather. If you cannot breathe, it is too tight and it is doing nothing for you.
  • Wearing it the whole session. Open it between sets. That is exactly where the lever pays off.
  • Ignoring the lever screws. Check them every three or four weeks so the buckle never lets go mid-rep.
  • Defaulting to 13 mm. Thicker is not better. If you squat under 400 lb (180 kg), 10 mm will serve you better and feel far less punishing.
  • Using the belt to cover a weak brace. It amplifies abdominal pressure you already know how to create without it.

Short version: stable bodyweight and one use case, buy the lever. Fluctuating weight or mixed use, buy the single prong. Either way, go 10 mm thick, 4 inches wide, non-stretch leather, and you are legal everywhere.

Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it:

mathieu

mathieu

Street workout athlete since 2019, I discovered streetlifting in 2023. Today I share my passion for the sport through streetliftings.com.

]]>
Negative Pull-Ups: The Lowering That Gets You Your First Rep https://www.streetliftings.com/negative-pull-ups/ Sun, 11 Oct 2026 22:16:37 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/negative-pull-ups/
Negative Pull-Ups: The Lowering That Gets You Your First Rep

Negative pull ups keep only half the movement, the half you are strongest in: the lowering. You get your chin over the bar with a box, a bench or a jump, then you fight gravity all the way down to straight arms. Two very different lifters live on this exercise: the one who cannot do a single rep yet, building the strength they are missing, and the one already pulling with a 45 lb plate (20 kg) on a belt, chasing an overload no other drill provides. Same movement, two completely different prescriptions.

Negative Pull-Ups: Why Lowering Builds Pulling Strength

A muscle under tension while it lengthens produces more force than the same muscle shortening. In isolated fiber, maximal eccentric force reaches roughly 1.8 times maximal isometric force. In a whole human, neural inhibition pulls that ratio down to about 1.2 times, but it still beats what you can produce concentrically, as laid out in a review published in Frontiers in Physiology in 2017. In gym terms: you can control a descent you have no chance of reversing. That gap is the entire reason the negative pull-up works.

The same review covers the second half of the story, energy cost. At a matched movement speed, positive work costs about six times more energy than negative work, with fewer motor units recruited and a lower discharge rate. Huge mechanical tension, very little metabolic bill. That is why three sets of negatives leave you shaky without leaving you winded.

What Eccentric Training Actually Buys You

The systematic review by Douglas and colleagues in Sports Medicine, 2017, concluded that eccentric training produces greater strength gains, though largely specific to the contraction mode, and increases muscle cross-sectional area at least as much as other methods, with a preferential growth of type II fibers. A more recent meta-analysis in Sports, pooling 8 randomized controlled trials and 441 participants, found an effect size of 0.95 for strength and 0.60 for hypertrophy favoring eccentric work, with a wide gap in rate of force development.

Pay attention to the word “specific,” because that is where lifters get burned. Negatives alone will not hand you a full pull-up. They build the strength reserve; the attempt at the concentric is what converts it into a rep that counts. Keep real pulling in your week alongside them, bands or assisted reps, the way the guide to progressing at pull-ups lays it out.

Muscles Worked in a Negative Pull-Up

The same ones as a standard pull-up, loaded while lengthening and for far longer under tension. Lats and teres major resist the arm traveling away from your torso through the whole descent. Lower traps and rhomboids control the shoulder blade as it rides back up your ribcage, and that is where beginners break first: the shoulder rides up toward the ear and the rep turns into a drop. Biceps brachii and brachialis brake elbow extension, and your finger flexors hold the bar from start to finish, so grip often quits before your back does. Your abs and glutes keep the pelvis from swinging forward and turning the negative into a pendulum.

Electromyography work on pull-up variations, including Dickie and colleagues in 2017, shows more biceps activity with a close supinated grip and more lat activity with a wide pronated grip. For negatives, stay with a pronated, shoulder-width grip. It is the grip you actually want to own, and it keeps the elbow in a comfortable angle across a long descent.

How to Do a Negative Pull-Up, Step by Step

  1. Get to the top without spending energy: a box, a bench, or a jump off the floor. You are not training the way up.
  2. Set the top position properly. Chin over the bar, chest tall, shoulder blades down and squeezed, elbows pointing at the floor.
  3. Legs slightly in front, pelvis locked, abs braced. No arch, no swing.
  4. Lower at a constant speed, no dead time at the top: the same pace from chin to straight arms.
  5. Finish with arms fully extended and shoulders still engaged. Full range is half the benefit.
  6. Step down, reset at the top, go again. The reset is part of the set, so do not rush it.

The Right Tempo, Not the Longest One

Three to five seconds of real control beats ten seconds where the last four are a free fall. The thing that drives adaptation is tension held across the whole range. When you can no longer hit your target tempo, the set is over, even if you had reps left on paper.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Getting Your First Pull-Up With Negatives

The protocol that works is deliberately small: 3 to 5 sets of 3 to 5 negatives, 3 to 5 seconds down, 2 to 3 minutes of rest between sets, twice a week. No more than that. Negatives are expensive both neurally and mechanically, and unaccustomed eccentric work is exactly what produces the most muscle damage and soreness. The good news is that the damage drops sharply after the first few sessions thanks to the repeated bout effect. The bad news is that if you start at six sessions a week, you will spend a month sore and gain nothing.

Progress in this order: tempo quality on 3 reps first, then rep count, then descent length. Once you own 5 clean negatives at 5 seconds, you are physically ready for the full rep, and the method for your first pull-up walks through how to set that attempt up. Once you clear 8 bodyweight reps, roll straight into the weighted pull-up program.

Weighted Negatives: Eccentric Overload for the Weighted Pull-Up

Once you can pull, the problem flips. Your concentric caps the load you can handle, while your descent could absorb considerably more. Weighted negatives remove that cap: you get to the top with help from your legs, you come down with the weight.

The numbers come from the research. Testing eccentric-only bench press, Moir and colleagues in 2013 loaded 9 resistance-trained men at 110, 120 and 130 percent of their concentric 1RM, who completed 14.2, 11.4 and 9.4 reps respectively, and projected an eccentric max near 165 percent of the concentric max. On the payoff side, a study published in Frontiers in Physiology in 2023 compared 10 weeks of accentuated eccentric loading at 90 percent versus 120 percent of 1RM in 27 active men: 6.3 percent strength gain in the submaximal group, not statistically significant, against 16.3 percent in the supramaximal group. That is the case for loading the descent, provided you keep the volume honest.

Variable Negatives for your first rep Weighted negatives
Load Bodyweight only 105 to 115 percent of total load, bodyweight included
Descent 3 to 5 seconds 3 to 4 seconds, never longer
Sets and reps 3 to 5 sets of 3 to 5 3 to 4 sets of 2 to 3
Frequency Twice a week Once a week, in a 3 to 4 week block
Spot in the session Early, after a full warm-up After your heavy pull-up sets
Purpose Build strength you do not have Break through your concentric ceiling

Run the math carefully, because in a pull-up your body is part of the load. A 175 lb (79 kg) lifter whose best single is plus 60 lb (27 kg) is moving 235 lb (107 kg) total. Targeting 110 percent of that total, 258 lb (117 kg), means hanging about 83 lb (38 kg) off the belt, not 66. The jump is bigger than it looks, so climb in 10 lb (5 kg) steps. Use the same belt or vest you already train with, and have a partner help you reach the top. Setup and progression details live in the weighted pull-up guide. The same logic transfers directly to dips, where loading the descent is even easier, and the weighted dip program already builds it in. For the weighted muscle up program, the negative is there to teach a controlled transition, not to pile on plates.

Mistakes That Cancel the Benefit

  • Dropping at the end. Two-thirds controlled and one-third free fall is a joint exercise, not a strength exercise. Shorten your target tempo until you can own the full range.
  • Stopping at half-extended elbows. You are cutting out the position where you are weakest, which is the one that needs the work most. Finish straight, shoulders engaged.
  • Doing them every day. Eccentric work generates more muscle damage than concentric work. Two sessions a week is plenty for a beginner, one for weighted negatives.
  • Muscling your way to the top. Burn yourself out getting up there and nothing is left for the part that matters. Box, bench, or jump, every single rep.
  • Running negatives only. Eccentric gains are mode-specific. Without a full-rep attempt every week, you will get strong at lowering and still not pull.
  • Adding weight too early. Weighted negatives assume a clean full-range pull-up. Before that, bodyweight is already giving you all the stimulus you can use.

Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it:

mathieu

mathieu

Street workout athlete since 2019, I discovered streetlifting in 2023. Today I share my passion for the sport through streetliftings.com.

]]>
Best Weightlifting Shoes: Do You Actually Need a Heel? https://www.streetliftings.com/best-weightlifting-shoes/ Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:20:49 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/best-weightlifting-shoes/
Best Weightlifting Shoes: Do You Actually Need a Heel?

Hunting for the best weightlifting shoes usually starts with the wrong question. Brand and colorway do not matter. What matters is one thing: a stiff, raised heel changes your ankle angle, and that changes how deep you can sit and how the load splits between hip, knee and ankle. If your heels peel off the floor at the bottom of a squat, a heeled shoe is the most direct fix you can buy. If your ankles are already mobile, it buys you almost nothing. Here is how to decide, self-test included.

What a raised heel actually does to your squat

To descend in a squat, your shin has to travel forward over your foot. That is ankle dorsiflexion. When you run out of it, your body finds a workaround: heels lift, chest dives forward, low back rounds at the bottom. A raised heel solves it from the equipment side. It starts your foot slightly plantarflexed, so you have more ankle range left in the tank for the same depth.

This is not gym-bro theory. In a 2016 study in the Journal of Sports Sciences, 32 lifters performed back squats loaded and unloaded, in weightlifting shoes and in regular athletic shoes, under 3D motion capture and on a force plate. In both load conditions, the weightlifting shoes produced significantly less ankle flexion and more knee flexion. One finding is worth your attention: unloaded, the experienced lifters exploited the effect more than the novices, with greater knee and hip flexion. The heel opens a door, your technique still has to walk through it.

What the heel does not do

The “stays more upright” claim is oversold. Reviews of the available research find ankle dorsiflexion dropping roughly 2 to 5 degrees depending on the protocol, but the effect on actual torso angle in a high-bar back squat is inconsistent across studies. A heel will not fix a butt wink, will not replace bracing, and will not add 45 lb (20 kg) to your squat. It lets you reach depth without your heels leaving the platform.

Muscles worked shift when the heel goes up

Move the ankle angle and you move the labor. A 2022 study in Bioengineering had 20 trained lifters squat at 70% of their one-rep max using heel insoles of 0, 0.6 in (1.5 cm) and 1.2 in (3 cm). The higher the heel, the less ankle dorsiflexion. Vastus lateralis activation rose with the 1.2 in insole in men, the calf did more, the tibialis anterior did less. Most telling: the share of joint work taken by the ankle climbed sharply, while the hip’s share dropped in the men tested.

In plain terms, a heel makes your squat more vertical and more quad-driven, less posterior-chain dominant. That is exactly what an Olympic lifter wants on a deep high-bar squat, and what a streetlifting squat competitor wants in order to stay under the bar. If you squat low-bar on purpose to load the hips, that same shift works against you: you end up training the muscle group you were trying to spare.

Best weightlifting shoes vs flat shoes vs running shoes

Forget rankings for a second. Pick the category first, then the pair. Anything that compresses under load steals force and stability from you.

Shoe type Heel Who it suits Skip it if
Weightlifting shoe Stiff, raised Deep high-bar squats, snatch, clean and jerk, stiff ankles You want one pair for every session
Flat squat shoe Flat, hard sole Low-bar squats, deadlifts, streetlifting, mobile ankles Your heels lift the moment you break parallel
Running shoe Compressible foam Running, nothing under a barbell You are lifting anything heavy
Barefoot or socks None Mobility drills, light sets, technique Your gym bans it or you want lateral support

For actual model picks, the squat shoes guide already lines up flat and heeled pairs with their specs, so this article will not repeat that comparison.

The streetlifting case

In streetlifting, the squat is one lift out of four. A heel does nothing for your weighted dips, weighted pull-ups or muscle-ups: you are hanging or supported on bars, floor contact is irrelevant, and a heavy weightlifting shoe is just extra load you have to carry in your belt or vest. Most athletes keep a flat pair for the weighted dip program and the weighted muscle-up program, then pull out the heeled pair only on heavy squat days. For a sense of what the top end looks like, the streetlifting squat world records show the loads being moved.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Heel height, stiffness and straps: the specs that matter

Four things, in this order.

  1. Heel height. The standard wedge sits around 0.75 in. On a Nike Romaleos 4, the measured effective heel height is 0.78 in (20 mm). Higher is not better: the taller the heel, the more you load the knees and calves, and the stranger your flat-shoe lifts will feel when you switch back.
  2. Stiffness. The heel should be wood or dense TPU, never foam. Store test: squeeze the heel between two fingers. It should not give at all.
  3. Strap setup. One or two midfoot straps on top of the laces. That is what stops your foot sliding forward when you rebound out of the hole.
  4. Width. Lifting shoes often run narrow. If your toes cannot spread, you lose the tripod foot that the whole lift is balanced on. Order your true width, not your sneaker size.

On the rules side, the International Powerlifting Federation caps the underside of the shoe at 2 in (5 cm) at any point, and loose inner soles that did not come with the shoe at 0.4 in (1 cm). No commercial lifting shoe comes close to that ceiling, and weightlifting boots are explicitly an approved footwear category, so you are fine on the platform.

Do you really need a heel? The wall test

Measure before you buy. The weight-bearing lunge test takes two minutes and a tape measure.

  • Face a wall, front foot flat, and drive your knee toward the wall without ever letting the heel rise.
  • Walk the foot back to the farthest distance where your knee still touches the wall with the heel down.
  • Measure from the wall to your big toe. At least 5 in (12.5 cm) is considered normal range.
  • Test both sides. A clear left-right gap means you have an ankle to unlock before you spend a dollar.

Under 5 in, a raised heel helps you immediately, and you also have mobility homework. Over 5 in, and if you can hold a full squat with both heels planted without tipping backward, you do not need a heeled shoe to squat. Keep a flat pair and put the money somewhere else.

Your action plan

  1. Run the wall test on both legs and write down the numbers.
  2. Film a 70% squat from the front and the side. Watch one thing only: do your heels stay down at the bottom.
  3. If they lift, train three sessions with about 0.8 in of heel wedge, two 5 lb plates or a board under your heels. It costs nothing and tells you whether a heel suits you before you pay for one.
  4. If the trial works, buy a stiff pair around 0.75 to 0.8 in of heel, in your true foot width.
  5. Keep a flat pair for deadlifts and bar work, and save the heel for squat days. Run the squat on a real strength block like the squat program, and keep building upper body pulling with the weighted pull-up program.

Three mistakes to avoid

Buying a heel to hide a stiff ankle and never training mobility. The heel compensates, it does not fix. Keep ten minutes of ankle mobility a week on the calendar.

Squatting in running shoes because “they cushion.” Foam compresses unevenly under 300 lb (135 kg) and your balance drifts sideways. It is the fastest way to miss a max attempt.

Using one pair for everything. A 0.8 in heel on a deadlift lengthens the bar path and shoves you onto your toes. Two pairs, two jobs.

Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it:

mathieu

mathieu

Street workout athlete since 2019, I discovered streetlifting in 2023. Today I share my passion for the sport through streetliftings.com.

]]>
Streetlifting Euros 2024 vs 2026: What the Data Shows https://www.streetliftings.com/streetlifting-euros-2024-2026-analysis/ https://www.streetliftings.com/streetlifting-euros-2024-2026-analysis/#respond Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:30:09 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/?p=8984
Finalrep Euros 26 — Street Lifting results

Two years separate the last two European streetlifting championships: Dessau-Roßlau, Germany, in November 2024, then Tremblay-en-France, on the outskirts of Paris, in October 2026. Both were organised by Final Rep, with the same rules, almost the same weight classes and many of the same athletes. That makes it a rare chance to answer, with numbers, a question the whole sport is asking: is the European level really rising, and how fast?

This study compares the 186 performances of both championships, attempt by attempt. The data is published as open data on data.gouv.fr, so anyone can check and extend the analysis.

Both editions at a glance
Euros 2024Euros 2026
Athletes84102 (+21%)
Nations1720
Average total, shared weight classes355.3 kg378.7 kg (+6.6%)
Successful attempts71.3%72.6%
Best women's total300 kg320 kg
Best men's total610 kg635 kg
French medals7 (3 gold)12 (3 gold)

A championship that keeps growing

The first and most visible finding: the Euros are drawing more athletes. 102 athletes competed in 2026, up from 84 two years earlier, a 21% increase. The number of nations rose from 17 to 20, with newcomers including Sweden, Croatia, Slovakia and North Macedonia.

Most of the growth came from the men, up from 44 to 59, while the women went from 40 to 43. Part of this is due to the new men's weight classes: the 2024 +94 kg class was split into -101 kg and +101 kg, which automatically opens an extra podium for heavier athletes.

Italy brought the largest team in 2024 (16 athletes), but France took the lead in 2026 with 23 athletes, ahead of Italy (21) and Germany (10). Hosting the championship obviously played a big part, as we will see.

The level is rising, especially among women

Comparing two championships means comparing like with like. The analysis below therefore covers the ten weight classes common to both editions (five women's, five men's, from -66 kg to -94 kg) and only validated performances.

Average total by weight class

Weight classAverage 2024Average 2026Change
Women -52 kg211.2 kg234.3 kg+23.1 kg
Women -57 kg247.6 kg239.2 kg-8.4 kg
Women -63 kg238.6 kg281.5 kg+43.0 kg
Women -70 kg255.6 kg275.9 kg+20.3 kg
Women +70 kg234.1 kg268.6 kg+34.5 kg
Men -66 kg399.3 kg430.4 kg+31.1 kg
Men -73 kg466.7 kg473.8 kg+7.1 kg
Men -80 kg506.7 kg486.2 kg-20.5 kg
Men -87 kg510.8 kg528.8 kg+18.0 kg
Men -94 kg527.7 kg548.2 kg+20.5 kg

Eight classes out of ten improved. Overall, the average total rose by 6.6% in two years. But the average hides a clear gap between the sexes: +9.4% for women (from 238.2 to 260.5 kg) against +3.2% for men (from 478.8 to 494.0 kg).

The two declines come from the make-up of the fields rather than a drop in level. In men's -80 kg, the class grew from 6 to 9 athletes and the two lowest totals (435 and 387.5 kg) pull the average down, while the top six improved (510.2 kg on average, against 506.7 kg in 2024). In women's -57 kg, a single very incomplete performance, with 20 kg validated on the squat, drags the average down: without it, the class averages 258 kg, above 2024, and the winner lifted 31 kg more than the 2024 champion.

What it takes to reach the podium

The average tells you the general level. The podium threshold, meaning the third-place total, tells you what it takes to matter at the top.

Weight class3rd place 20243rd place 2026Winner 2024Winner 2026
Women -52 kg216.5 kg245 kg233.75 kg261.25 kg
Women -57 kg260 kg245 kg274.75 kg305.75 kg
Women -63 kg248.75 kg295.25 kg268.75 kg318 kg
Women -70 kg266.75 kg289.5 kg286.25 kg291.25 kg
Women +70 kg240 kg277.5 kg300 kg320 kg
Men -66 kg420 kg453.75 kg434.75 kg473.75 kg
Men -73 kg483.75 kg487.5 kg526.75 kg491.25 kg
Men -80 kg505 kg512.5 kg527.5 kg534 kg
Men -87 kg517.5 kg540 kg584.25 kg571.25 kg
Men -94 kg520 kg570 kg610 kg610 kg

The podium threshold went up in nine classes out of ten. The biggest jumps were in women's -63 kg (+46.5 kg) and men's -94 kg (+50 kg): in 2026, a total that would have won bronze in 2024 no longer gets you into the top three. Winning totals move less consistently, which makes sense: they depend on a single athlete and their day. Xavier Macias even posted exactly the same winning total, 610 kg, in men's -94 kg at both editions.

The muscle-up is improving fastest

Attempt-by-attempt data lets us go beyond the total and see where the kilos were gained. Here is the average validated load on each movement, again across the ten shared weight classes.

MovementAverage 2024Average 2026ChangeWomenMen
Muscle-up20.8 kg24.2 kg+16.4%+37.9%+6.2%
Pull-up60.7 kg65.1 kg+7.1%+7.7%+4.6%
Dips96.6 kg103.8 kg+7.5%+12.1%+3.2%
Squat177.2 kg185.7 kg+4.8%+6.3%+2.2%

The muscle-up is improving fastest, by a wide margin: +16% on average and nearly +38% for women, whose average load went from 10.7 to 14.7 kg. The squat, the heaviest movement, improved the least in relative terms.

This matches what we found on French competitions in our "Anatomy of a total" analysis: the muscle-up is the least evenly mastered movement, and therefore the one with the most room for progress. At European level, that gap is starting to close. In kilos the gains remain modest though: 3.4 kg more on the muscle-up, against 8.5 kg on the squat.

The make-up of a total barely moves

Despite these changes, the structure of a total stays stable: across all validated performances, the squat makes up 51.4% of the total in 2024 and 50.2% in 2026, dips 26.7% then 27.3%, pull-ups 16.7% then 16.8%, and the muscle-up 5.3% then 5.8%. The squat gives up a little ground to the three upper-body movements, without changing the overall balance.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Successful attempts: pull-ups soar, the squat slips

Each athlete gets three attempts per movement, twelve in total. The share of attempts the judges validate says a lot about technical mastery and how athletes choose their loads.

MovementSuccessful attempts 2024Successful attempts 2026
Muscle-up67.9%70.9%
Pull-up76.6%82.4%
Dips69.4%69.3%
Squat71.4%67.7%
Overall71.3%72.6%

The overall rate barely moves, but two movements diverge. On pull-ups, more than four attempts out of five are now validated. On the squat, success is down, and the drop is sharp among women: 69.2% of attempts validated in 2024, 63.6% in 2026. Athletes seem to have taken more risks on their last squat attempts, for an average gain of only 4.8%.

The share of unvalidated performances is stable: 4 out of 84 in 2024, 5 out of 102 in 2026, under 5% in both cases. At European level, missing a movement entirely remains rare.

The athletes who came back

The value of the same championship two years apart is that you can follow the athletes. 36 competitors took part in both editions. Thirteen of them changed weight class, usually moving up. Among the 22 who stayed in the same class and were validated at both editions, the picture is clear:

  • 17 improved, 4 went backwards, and only one posted the same total;
  • the median gain is +23.75 kg on the total;
  • by movement, the median gain is +7.5 kg on the squat, +5 kg on the muscle-up, +4.5 kg on dips and +2.5 kg on pull-ups.

Relative to the average total, this median gain is about 6% in two years, in line with the overall rise in level. So the higher level does not only come from stronger newcomers: returning athletes are improving too.

Largely renewed podiums

Of the 36 medallists in 2026, 17 had already competed in 2024 and 13 had already been on a podium. Only three champions kept a European title: Sarah Anyamele in women's +70 kg, Xavier Macias in men's -94 kg, and Aubin Chevillard, champion at -73 kg in 2024 and then at -80 kg in 2026. The other nine titles changed hands.

France, top nation at the 2026 Euros

With 12 medals, including 3 gold, 5 silver and 4 bronze, France finished as the top nation at the 2026 Euros, ahead of Italy (7 medals, including 3 gold) and Germany (5 medals). In 2024, France had 7 medals, including 3 titles, behind Italy.

FranceEuros 2024Euros 2026
Athletes15 (7 women, 8 men)23 (10 women, 13 men)
Share of the field17.9%22.5%
Medals (gold / silver / bronze)7 (3 / 1 / 3)12 (3 / 5 / 4)
Top-6 finishes1219
European titlesMen -66, -73 and -80 kgWomen -52 and -70 kg, men -80 kg
Unvalidated performances14

Two trends stand out. First, gold switched sides: all three 2024 titles were men's, while two of the three 2026 titles went to women, Ludivine Compain at -52 kg and Myriam Chebira at -70 kg. Second, depth: 19 French athletes finished in the top six of their class, against 12 in 2024.

These numbers still need to be read with care. The championship was held in France, and a home event naturally attracts more national athletes: the medal count rose partly because the number of French entries grew by half. The return per athlete stayed remarkably stable: roughly one medal for every two athletes, 7 for 15 in 2024 and 12 for 23 in 2026. The five French athletes who competed in the same class at both editions improved by a median of 27.5 kg, slightly above the European figure.

To follow these athletes on the national scene, our French competitions dataset uses the same identifiers, so careers can be cross-referenced between the two datasets.

Method, limitations and open data

The results come from the Final Rep platform, which organised both championships, and were collected attempt by attempt. Consistency check: for each of the 177 validated performances, the sum of the four best successful attempts equals the official total. Full results with names are available in our Euros 2024 and Euros 2026 results articles.

Why this study ignores the RIS

The RIS, the index that weights the total by bodyweight, would seem the ideal tool to compare two editions. It is not, here: its scale changed between 2025 and 2026. In the same weight class, the ratio between total and RIS rose by about 17% for women and 3% for men. The same athlete, at almost the same bodyweight, scored a RIS of 139.7 for 337.5 kg in 2025, then 113.6 for 320 kg in 2026. Comparing RIS across editions would suggest a drop in level that does not exist. The whole comparison therefore relies on the total, within the same weight class.

Other caveats

  • Two championships do not make a trend: with 8 or 9 athletes per class, results are sensitive to who shows up.
  • Nationality is taken from the athlete's current profile on the platform.
  • The source does not publish bodyweight at event level, so it could not be used.

Open data

The full dataset is published on data.gouv.fr under the Open Licence 2.0: European streetlifting championships: 2024 and 2026 results. It contains all 186 performances, successful attempts per movement and a data dictionary. Athletes are pseudonymised.

Key takeaways

In two years, Europe's streetlifting elite added about 6% to their totals, with women improving two to three times faster than men. Podiums are harder to reach, the muscle-up is improving faster than the other movements, and France, helped by a home championship, has become the continent's leading nation.

For anyone aiming at the next international championships, the message is simple: the level required rises from one edition to the next, and it rises on all four movements at once. Preparing for that level calls for programming that treats the total as a whole. That is the approach behind our streetlifting training programs. To compare these totals with the best performances ever recorded, see our streetlifting total records, and to discover the sport, our complete streetlifting guide.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Nous n'avons pas pu confirmer votre inscription.
Votre inscription est confirmée.

Newsletter

Inscrivez-vous à notre newsletter pour suivre nos actualités.

]]>
https://www.streetliftings.com/streetlifting-euros-2024-2026-analysis/feed/ 0
Pull-Up and Dip Station: How to Choose a Power Tower https://www.streetliftings.com/pull-up-and-dip-station/ Mon, 05 Oct 2026 22:14:30 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/pull-up-and-dip-station/
Pull-Up and Dip Station: How to Choose a Power Tower

A pull-up and dip station, the free-standing frame most brands label a power tower, is the cheapest way to get both basic upper-body movements into an apartment. No drilling, no load-bearing wall to hunt for, two exercises ready in three seconds. The catch: every one of these frames looks identical in the product photo, and the gap between a solid one and a wobbly one is huge. Here is what actually decides the purchase, and what is pure marketing.

Pull-Up and Dip Station: What a Power Tower Adds

A power tower is a self-supporting frame: two uprights, an H-shaped or U-shaped base, a pull-up bar on top, two parallel handles at hip height for dips, usually armrests for knee raises and low handles for push-ups.

Against a wall-mounted or ceiling-mounted bar, you trade rigidity for freedom. You can move it, break it down, set it up in a rental without touching the drywall. If you own the place and you have a stud wall or solid joists, a mounted bar is stronger for the same money, and the pull-up bar buying guide breaks down the mounting options. Same logic on the pressing side: if all you want is dips, a pair of low parallel bars is more stable and stores flat, which is what the dip bars guide covers. The tower is the one piece that gives you both inside about ten square feet.

Weight Capacity, and What That Number Hides

This is the headline spec and the most misread one. Consumer towers run from 220 lb (100 kg) to 440 lb (200 kg) of rated capacity. That number covers your bodyweight plus everything you are carrying. At 180 lb (82 kg) bodyweight with a 45 lb (20 kg) belt, you are at 225 lb (102 kg) standing still, so a tower rated 220 lb is already past its limit, before you account for the force spike at the bottom of a pull-up, which runs well above your static weight.

Look at what produces that rating instead. Two towers from the same manufacturer, 110 lb (50 kg) apart on paper, show exactly where the money goes:

Spec Rated 330 lb (150 kg) Rated 440 lb (200 kg)
Steel wall thickness 1.2 mm 1.5 mm
Frame weight 35.7 lb (16.2 kg) 49.4 lb (22.45 kg)
Overall height 82.7 in (2 100 mm) 90.6 in (2 300 mm)
Base footprint 30.1 x 36.2 in 30.1 x 36.2 in
Bar height settings 10 levels, 67 to 82.7 in 10 levels, 74.8 to 90.5 in

Three things to take from those published manufacturer specs. First, three tenths of a millimeter of steel is the whole difference between a 330 lb and a 440 lb rating, so wall thickness is the real spec to chase. Second, frame weight climbs from 35.7 lb to 49.4 lb: a 7 ft tower that weighs 35 lb empty is light, and you feel it the moment you swing. Third, the footprint is identical on both models. Stability is not what the capacity rating measures.

One more check: the usage class. EN ISO 20957-1, updated in December 2024, sorts stationary training equipment into class H for domestic use and class S for professional or commercial gym use. A brand that publishes its class is telling you it tested the frame. A brand that cites no standard at all is just asking you to trust the sticker.

Footprint, Tipping and Ceiling Height

The base decides everything

A pull-up tower loads in cantilever: your body hangs in front of the bar, not under the center of the frame. Swing even slightly and the rear feet start to lift. Three things fight that: a deep footprint, floor crossmembers that bolt together instead of just slotting in, and feet that grip. Around 36 in (90 cm) front to back is the minimum for an adult, and the heavier you are, the more depth you want.

Run this test on assembly day. Hang with straight arms, then deliberately rock your hips front to back. If a foot leaves the floor, push the tower against a wall, load the base with plates, or send it back. Do not add weight until that test is clean.

Measure your ceiling before you order

This is the most common and most avoidable mistake. A standard tower tops out at 82.7 in (2.10 m), a reinforced one at 90.6 in (2.30 m). Add roughly 10 in for your hand above the bar at the top of a pull-up, plus clearance for your head: you want 8 to 12 in free above the bar so you are not ducking. With a typical 8 ft (2.44 m) American ceiling, a 90.6 in tower will not run at its top setting.

Check hang clearance too. You need to finish a rep with straight arms without your feet touching, knees bent if that is what it takes. Muscle-ups are stricter still, since they need room above the bar and a frame that does not flex: confirm both before you start the weighted muscle-up program, and never kip on a light tower.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Dip Handle Spacing

The dip handles on a tower are almost always fixed, and that is their real weakness. On brand-name racks, adjustable dip handle spacing spans roughly 16 to 25.5 in across the common series. Your reference is your own shoulder width: at the bottom of the rep, your forearms should be vertical. If they splay outward, the handles are too wide and you are loading the front of your shoulder for nothing.

Measure your shoulder width and compare it to the published spacing before you order. An inch of difference is manageable, four inches is not. Towers with slightly converging V-shaped handles are the better compromise: you pick your own width by sliding your hands forward or back.

Muscles Worked on a Pull-Up and Dip Station

On the bar you hit the lats, teres major, lower traps, rhomboids, rear delts, biceps and brachioradialis, with the finger flexors and your brace holding everything together. On the dip handles you shift to the lower pec, triceps, front delts and pec minor, with the scapular stabilizers holding the position.

That is the genuine case for one of these frames: a vertical pull and a vertical press on the same structure, so your upper body stays balanced without buying anything else. Knee-raise pads and push-up handles are a bonus, not a reason to pick one model over another.

Adding Weight Without Tipping the Frame

A decent tower handles added load fine, as long as you change how you move. The weight hangs below you and behaves like a pendulum, so any leg drive goes straight into the frame. Three rules: start from a dead hang with no swing, lower under control, and keep your legs still and slightly in front of you to kill the sway.

On gear, a dip belt beats a weighted vest on a tower. The belt keeps the load low and close to your axis, while a vest moves mass upward and lengthens the lever that lifts the rear of the base. For programming, nothing exotic is needed: the weighted pull-up program and the weighted dip program set the loads and the progressions, and the frame changes nothing about how the sets run.

Mistakes to Avoid Before You Order

  1. Buying without measuring the ceiling. Room height, minus 90.6 in of tower, minus 10 in of hand above the bar. If the math goes negative, pick a shorter model.
  2. Reading the rating as usable load. Bodyweight plus added weight has to sit well under it. Keep at least 65 lb (30 kg) of margin.
  3. Ignoring wall thickness. Under 1.5 mm, forget heavy loading. If the spec sheet does not list it, assume it is thin.
  4. Picking the lightest frame. Under 44 lb (20 kg) empty for a 7 ft tower means a frame that vibrates. Shipping weight is a quality signal, not a drawback.
  5. Torquing the bolts in one pass. Assemble loose, square the tower in place, then tighten everything down. Re-torque after two weeks, which is when the slop shows up.
  6. Standing it on bare hardwood. A half-inch mat under the base protects the floor, damps vibration and gives the feet something to bite.

If your room fails those six checks, do not force it. A mounted bar plus a set of low parallel bars usually costs less, takes less space and does not move a millimeter.

Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it:

mathieu

mathieu

Street workout athlete since 2019, I discovered streetlifting in 2023. Today I share my passion for the sport through streetliftings.com.

]]>
Finalrep Euros 26: Full Street Lifting Results https://www.streetliftings.com/finalrep-euros-26-street-lifting-results/ https://www.streetliftings.com/finalrep-euros-26-street-lifting-results/#respond Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:02:09 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/finalrep-euros-26-street-lifting-results/
Finalrep Euros 26 — Street Lifting results

Women -52kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇫🇷 Ludivine Compain 20 38.75 67.5 135 261.25 kg 111.13
2 🇫🇷 Agathe Casanova 15 35 66.25 132.5 248.75 kg 108.26
3 🇬🇧 Cindy ha 10 35 60 140 245 kg 101.08
4 🇬🇧 Mona Shafiei 13.75 41.25 55 122.5 232.5 kg 95.66
5 🇪🇸 Maragda Puigcerver 22.75 27.5 53.75 122.5 226.5 kg 94.47
6 🇮🇹 Denise Lauro 11.25 32.5 48.75 132.5 225 kg 95.44
7 🇵🇹 Jessica Luisa 17.5 37.5 63.75 100 218.75 kg 92.26
8 🇮🇹 Aurora Riccardi 11.25 30 55 120 216.25 kg 88.98
Dis 🇵🇱 Julia Lis 15 40 0 0 55 kg 23.46

Women -57kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇬🇧 Martha Lubczynskyj 32 61.25 72.5 140 305.75 kg 115.18
2 🇫🇷 Julie Brion 15 35 82.5 155 287.5 kg 108.30
3 🇩🇪 Layla-Jona Bake 20 40 57.5 127.5 245 kg 94.31
4 🇬🇷 Eleni Christinaki 10 40 60 135 245 kg 91.90
5 🇮🇹 Nicole Anania 15 30 47.5 145 237.5 kg 88.73
6 🇧🇪 Manon Vergucht 10 36.25 63.75 117.5 227.5 kg 84.89
7 🇮🇹 Sofia Cerdan Bes 10 30 66.25 20 126.25 kg 47.17
Dis 🇫🇷 lylia ammour 26.25 53.75 76.25 137.5 293.75 kg 109.61

Women -63kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇳🇱 Lynn narings 25.25 47.5 85.25 160 318 kg 114.03
2 🇬🇧 Gianna Webbe 17.5 60 87.5 140 305 kg 109.70
3 🇩🇪 Meike Pohl 15 41.25 72.5 166.5 295.25 kg 107.94
4 🇪🇸 Sara Leturiaga Lersundi 18.75 41.25 65 150 275 kg 99.03
5 🇫🇷 Maëlle Vioulac 10 36.25 70 150 266.25 kg 95.50
6 🇫🇮 Taru Riipinen 15 43.75 60 137.5 256.25 kg 92.03
7 🇵🇱 Katarzyna Najman 5 63.75 73.75 112.5 255 kg 93.98
Dis 🇫🇷 Camille BOUVOT GINHOUX 0 41.25 62.5 152.5 256.25 kg 91.89
En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Women -70kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇫🇷 Myriam Chebira 7.5 46.25 77.5 160 291.25 kg 103.60
2 🇩🇪 Christina Fröhlich 23.5 53.75 70 142.5 289.75 kg 103.08
3 🇫🇷 Miche de Malleray Guilhemette 12.5 48.75 80.75 147.5 289.5 kg 102.91
4 🇮🇹 Giorgia Galasi 17.5 51.25 70 150 288.75 kg 103.04
5 🇸🇪 Märta Paulsson 18.75 43.75 72.5 145 280 kg 99.65
6 🇳🇴 Frida Austigard Petersen 10 35 55 172.5 272.5 kg 97.13
7 🇬🇧 domiziana turcatti 12.5 38.75 62.5 150 263.75 kg 93.80
8 🇩🇪 Nadine Schulz 22.5 32.5 72.5 132.5 260 kg 92.43
9 🇸🇮 Ana Grimšičar 7.5 31.25 56.25 152.5 247.5 kg 88.19

Women +70kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇩🇪 Sarah Anyamele 26.25 46.25 77.5 170 320 kg 113.57
2 🇩🇪 Gesa Bimmermann 13.75 35 77.5 160 286.25 kg 101.59
3 🇸🇰 Miroslava Liptáková 15 42.5 60 160 277.5 kg 98.56
4 🇧🇪 Liselotte Den Haese 10 37.5 72.5 155 275 kg 97.65
5 🇫🇷 Dorene Iliev 7.5 35 71.25 155 268.75 kg 95.40
6 🇫🇷 Eliza Puech 15 35 65 145 260 kg 92.35
7 🇬🇧 Gabrielle Klimovitsky 17.5 46.25 70 117.5 251.25 kg 89.24
8 🇮🇹 Michela Bruschi 6.25 33.75 65 145 250 kg 88.73
9 🇬🇧 Saskia Guichard 6.25 32.5 55 135 228.75 kg 81.20

Men -66kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇮🇹 Walid Boulaghzalate 40 83.75 135 215 473.75 kg 113.25
2 🇫🇷 Julien Capdeville 31.25 76.25 143.5 207.5 458.5 kg 108.49
3 🇵🇱 Mateusz Koślak 25 101.25 140 187.5 453.75 kg 107.91
4 🇵🇱 Hubert Chwałek 35 82.5 127.5 190 435 kg 102.93
5 🇫🇷 Cyril brau 26.25 65 122.5 217.5 431.25 kg 101.78
6 🇮🇹 Gianmarco Pironi 22.5 71.25 120 212.5 426.25 kg 101.37
7 🇩🇪 Nana Boison 27.5 82.5 117.5 195 422.5 kg 100.48
8 🇷🇸 Marko Stepic 42.5 82.5 115 157.5 397.5 kg 94.17
9 🇭🇷 Lovro Topic 22.5 70 110 172.5 375 kg 91.80

Men -73kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇳🇱 Jurvin valdez 41.25 85 145 220 491.25 kg 108.33
2 🇵🇹 Lionel Da Silva 50 95 130 215 490 kg 106.22
3 🇵🇹 Henrique Nascimento 40 100 140 207.5 487.5 kg 109.14
4 🇪🇸 Pablo Reveriego Sansón 27.5 80 140 230 477.5 kg 103.88
5 🇮🇹 Alessio Ceragioli 32.5 82.5 111.25 245 471.25 kg 103.15
6 🇮🇹 Federico Fresta 40 82.5 120 182.5 425 kg 93.96
Dis 🇫🇷 Yohann CAPDEVILLE 36.25 86.25 0 0 122.5 kg 26.62
Dis 🇫🇷 Enzo Ingrassia 30 73.75 135 0 238.75 kg 52.26

Men -80kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇫🇷 Chevillard Aubin 45 109 155 225 534 kg 107.56
2 🇫🇷 Maxime poitevin 25 91.25 152.5 245 513.75 kg 105.15
3 🇫🇷 Raul Teslevici 40 95 130 247.5 512.5 kg 102.95
4 🇳🇱 Daniël Wassenaar 35 97.5 161.5 217.5 511.5 kg 105.76
5 🇩🇪 Pascal Klinkowski 32.5 86.25 121.25 255 495 kg 99.70
6 🇳🇴 Peter Tolstrup 35 93.75 155 210 493.75 kg 99.81
7 🇵🇱 Mateusz Zabost 30 90 152.5 220 492.5 kg 102.80
8 🇮🇹 Simone Facchinetti 15 70 135 215 435 kg 90.41
9 🇮🇹 Mattia Martinelli 40 90 25 232.5 387.5 kg 78.19

Men -87kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇷🇴 Lucian Stanut 45 98.75 147.5 280 571.25 kg 109.92
2 🇮🇹 Tony D'Agostino 33.75 95 130 302.5 561.25 kg 109.56
3 🇮🇹 Becaye Sane 50 102.5 147.5 240 540 kg 104.36
4 🇫🇷 Lucien Memery 33.75 91.25 156.25 252.5 533.75 kg 102.29
5 🇫🇷 Enzo Chartier 30 87.5 140 257.5 515 kg 101.19
6 🇭🇷 Andrea Popovic 37.5 97.5 150 225 510 kg 98.69
7 🇩🇪 Timo Wunnenberg 31.25 95 130 247.5 503.75 kg 96.76
8 🇸🇮 Saš Mišvelj 30 87.5 152.5 225 495 kg 94.59

Men -94kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇮🇹 Xavier Macias 40 110 157.5 302.5 610 kg 113.61
2 🇫🇷 Théo Goutte-toquet 25 97.5 190.25 257.5 570.25 kg 106.17
3 🇫🇷 Kevin AMANI GOGO 36.25 91.25 180 262.5 570 kg 106.31
4 🇳🇱 Tim Engel 36.25 100 152.5 265 553.75 kg 103.24
5 🇵🇱 Ignacy Panz 32.5 101.25 177.5 237.5 548.75 kg 102.79
6 🇬🇧 Charlie Cameron 27.5 95 160 265 547.5 kg 102.00
7 🇮🇹 Diego Corazza 37.5 97.5 152.5 232.5 520 kg 98.10
8 🇧🇪 Robin Pittia (Gohan) 15 70 160 265 510 kg 95.02
9 🇮🇹 Lorenzo Giussani 25 81.25 155 242.5 503.75 kg 94.55

Men -101kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇷🇺 Mathew Zlat 37.5 120 190 287.5 635 kg 116.23
2 🇮🇹 Leonardo Giliberto 21.25 85 150 295 551.25 kg 100.80
3 🇪🇸 Miguel Tirado Martínez 47.5 113.75 145 240 546.25 kg 101.06
4 🇸🇪 Albin Estève Gordan 20 86.25 160 270 536.25 kg 98.30
5 🇬🇧 Jomei Straker 22.5 92.5 155 260 530 kg 96.98
6 🇫🇷 Etienne Guillou 15 82.5 140 290 527.5 kg 97.28
7 🇮🇹 Guido Barbarotto 0 73.75 145 295.5 514.25 kg 95.06
8 🇩🇪 Christopher Jähn 23.75 85 130 272.5 511.25 kg 93.81
9 🇸🇮 David Milićević 20 82.5 125 252.5 480 kg 88.00

Men +101kg

Place Name Muscle Up Pull/Chin Up Dip Squat Total RIS
1 🇮🇹 Valerio Naldi 5 90 175 270 540 kg 97.34
2 🇮🇹 Daniele Mariani 18.75 78.75 135 275 507.5 kg 92.30
3 🇫🇷 Maxime Humily 17.5 78.75 125 285 506.25 kg 91.51
4 🇵🇱 Jakub Racewicz 20 87.5 130 265 502.5 kg 90.99
5 🇷🇸 Srdjan Pejanovic 0 75 130 230 435 kg 79.08
6 🇳🇴 Aun Evensen 3.75 60 145 225 433.75 kg 78.79
7 🇲🇰 Atanas Debnikov 7.5 60 110 200 377.5 kg 68.74

L’article vous a plu ? N’hésitez pas à le partager :

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Nous n'avons pas pu confirmer votre inscription.
Votre inscription est confirmée.

Newsletter

Inscrivez-vous à notre newsletter pour suivre nos actualités.

]]>
https://www.streetliftings.com/finalrep-euros-26-street-lifting-results/feed/ 0
Pull Up World Record: Every Guinness Mark, Event by Event https://www.streetliftings.com/pull-up-world-record/ Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:15:21 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/pull-up-world-record/
Pull Up World Record: Every Guinness Mark, Event by Event

There is no single pull up world record. There are five, and they belong to five different kinds of athlete: one minute, most consecutive reps, one hour, 12 hours and 24 hours. Here are the current Guinness World Records marks for bodyweight pull-ups, with holders, dates and places, plus what those numbers should change in your own training.

Every bodyweight pull up world record, event by event

All of the marks below are unweighted. The Guinness standard reads simple enough on paper: chin clears the bar, then the arms return to full extension. Watch the dates, because five of these nine marks were set in 2026.

Event Men’s record Women’s record
1 minute 90, Yutaro Matsuta (Japan), Setagaya, 10 April 2026 50, Elina Pashalanova (Bulgaria), Sofia, 18 November 2025
Most consecutive 1,224, Kenta Adachi (Japan), Shunan, 10 November 2024 No separate category
1 hour 1,280, Milos Blagojevic (Serbia), Belgrade, 5 April 2026 881, Elina Pashalanova (Bulgaria), Sofia, 9 January 2026
12 hours 7,316, Yutaro Matsuta (Japan), Yurihonjo, 8 May 2026 4,466, Olivia Vinson (Australia), Launceston, 2 March 2025
24 hours 12,345, Enrique Zapata (Mexico), Queretaro, 31 January 2026 7,079, Olivia Vinson (Australia), Launceston, 29 to 30 March 2025

Look at the men’s column: Yutaro Matsuta owns both the one minute mark and the 12 hour mark. That combination is rare, and it tells you how high his baseline sits. If your reps are not clean yet, start with the complete pull-up guide before you chase volume.

One minute vs most consecutive reps: two opposite skills

The one minute record

Ninety reps in 60 seconds is a rep and a half per second. Raw strength is not the limiter there: you need the minimum valid range of motion, a rebound at the bottom and zero dead time at the top. On the women’s side, Elina Pashalanova sits at 50, roughly one rep every 1.2 seconds. These are cadence records, not strength records, and they reward anyone who can cycle the bar fast without pausing at full extension.

The most consecutive pull-ups record

Kenta Adachi strung together 1,224 reps without stopping on 10 November 2024, after already posting 651 in March 2022. The rulebook explains the difficulty: no more than 15 seconds may pass between reps, the body stays straight, and the attempt ends the moment the athlete lets go of the bar, per the rules published by Guinness World Records. Hours on the bar with no release: the skin on your hands usually calls the end, not your lats.

Endurance records: one hour, 12 hours, 24 hours

Milos Blagojevic hit 1,280 reps in a single hour, more than 21 per minute sustained for 60 straight minutes. Over a full day, Enrique Zapata holds the ratified 24 hour mark at 12,345, which averages 8.6 reps per minute across 1,440 minutes, sleep included. Put those two side by side and the gap is obvious: the hour record is a sprint you can pace with a stopwatch, while the 24 hour record is a logistics problem. Food, fluids, tape, sleep windows and bar height all matter more than your max set.

The American who broke 10,000 first

Truett Hanes was the first to clear five figures, with 10,001 pull-ups on 1 and 2 February 2025 in his own garage gym. He beat Doug Martin’s September 2024 record of 9,250, and he got there on 120,000 practice reps over six months, up from 70,000 before his first attempt in 2023. He finished with his hands red and shaking, and needed days for the calluses to heal. Keep that ratio in mind: record day is the small visible part of an enormous training block.

Goggins, Ludo Adamantium and the marathon attempts

The best known rep challenge in this sport is still David Goggins’ 4,030 pull-ups in 17 hours, set in 2013, and the French athlete who passed it: 4,051 reps in 16 hours 24 minutes on 20 May 2025. The full story is here, Ludo Adamantium vs David Goggins’ pull-up record. Do not stack those numbers against the 12,345 figure above: different protocols, different clocks, different standards.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Muscles worked, and why these numbers are possible

A pull-up drives the lats and teres major, the biceps brachii and brachioradialis, the lower traps, rhomboids and rear delts, with the finger flexors and the abs holding the line. On a set of ten, your back and arms quit first. At several thousand reps, the limiters switch sides: grip, palm skin and shoulders decide how far you go. That is why a one hour specialist and a heavy single specialist train almost nothing in common.

If you want your clean max to climb, train frequency instead of suffering: short sets, stopped well short of failure, repeated often through the day. Balance the pulling volume with vertical pressing too, which is what the weighted dip program is built for, or your shoulders will hand you the bill.

Weighted pull-up records are a separate scoreboard

Add a belt and you stop counting reps: you count pounds on one single rep, inside a bodyweight class. The two lists share nothing. The heaviest mark on our board is 265 lb (120 kg) of added load in the under 192 lb (87 kg) class, and no 24 hour record holder would come close to it. Full details sit on the weighted pull-up records page. To train that way, use the weighted pull-up program, and the weighted muscle-up program if you want to finish above the bar.

Your action plan if you want a rep record

  1. Pick the event before you train. One minute, one hour and 12 hours are three unrelated preparations. Choose, then build.
  2. Test your starting point. One max set of strict reps, then a 10 minute test in short sets. You will see exactly where you leak.
  3. Stack volume over months. 120,000 reps in six months works out to about 660 per day. Start at 100 a day in sets of 5, spread from morning to night.
  4. Prep your hands. File the calluses, use chalk, pick a smooth bar. On long attempts the skin stops you before the muscles do.
  5. Film everything. Without continuous video, witnesses and a clean standard (chin over the bar, arms straight at the bottom), nothing gets ratified.

The usual mistakes: going out too hot in hour one, skipping water and carbs, choosing a bar so high you jump into every set, and training to failure every session. Record holders do the opposite, short sets, very often, for a very long time.

Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it:

mathieu

mathieu

Street workout athlete since 2019, I discovered streetlifting in 2023. Today I share my passion for the sport through streetliftings.com.

]]>
Weighted Vest for Pull Ups: How to Choose the Right One https://www.streetliftings.com/weighted-vest-for-pull-ups/ Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:26:26 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/weighted-vest-for-pull-ups/
Weighted Vest for Pull Ups: How to Choose the Right One

A weighted vest for pull ups is the piece of gear most people buy twice: once too heavy, once too long in the torso. Then it rides up under your chin on every rep and ends up in the closet. The vest is rarely the problem. The load you picked and the cut of the shell are. Here is what actually decides the purchase, use case by use case.

How Much Weight You Actually Need

Two different logics apply here, and mixing them up is the most common mistake.

For anything you do for volume, walking, circuits, push-ups, you work off a percentage of body weight. Puthoff and colleagues tested treadmill walking with vest loads at 10, 15 and 20 percent of body mass. Oxygen consumption and relative intensity climbed, but so did vertical ground reaction forces and loading rate. In plain terms: the vest makes you work harder, and it makes your joints absorb more. Start near 5 percent and build over weeks, not over three sessions. Puthoff et al., Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2006.

For weighted pull-ups and dips, percentages are useless. Your rep range decides. If you train sets of 5 and you own 12 clean bodyweight reps, the right load is the one that drops you back to 5 hard but complete reps. You are hunting a number on the bar, not a feeling. The weighted pull-up program lays out that progression set by set.

As a starting reference, a 150 lb (68 kg) lifter starts around 7.5 lb (3.4 kg) at 5 percent, works toward 15 lb (6.8 kg) at 10 percent, and only gets into the 22.5 to 30 lb (10 to 14 kg) range once trained, which lines up with the 5 to 20 percent band used for strength work.

Use Starting load Working range Limiting factor
Walking, rucking 5% of body weight 10 to 20% Ground impact and lower back
Weighted push ups 5% of body weight 10 to 20% Your midline, not your arms
Pull-ups, dips Lightest plate you own Set by your rep target Rep range
Running 5% maximum Do not exceed 5% Performance drops fast

20 lb, 40 lb or Adjustable?

A 20 lb (9 kg) vest covers most of what a home athlete does: circuits, push-ups, walking, first loaded sets. For a 175 lb (79 kg) lifter that is already about 11 percent of body weight, the upper half of the volume range. A 40 lb (18 kg) vest only earns its place if you pull and dip heavy, or you ruck real distance.

The number on the box matters less than the increment. An adjustable weighted vest rated to 40 lb but loaded at 12 lb is a better buy than a fixed 20 lb shell you max out in two months. The best weighted vest for you is the one with the widest useful progression range, not the biggest headline figure.

Choosing a Weighted Vest for Pull Ups and Dips

On the bar, fit beats everything. Three things separate a vest you keep for five years from one you use three times.

Torso length. A long running-cut vest rides up the moment you hang and jams under your chin at the top of the rep. For bar work you want a short shell that stops above the navel.

Shoulder clearance. Before you buy, press both arms straight overhead. If the vest pulls on your traps or rubs your collarbones in the overhead position, it will fight your dips too.

The cinch. A waist strap plus side closure, not shoulder straps alone. A loose vest turns every explosive rep into a hammer blow on your neck.

Load placement matters just as much. Flat plates spread front and back stay glued to your ribcage. Concentrated or sand-filled loads shift mid-rep, and you spend the set chasing them. If you are still deciding between methods rather than models, how to add weight to pull-ups compares all three options, and why use a weighted vest for pull-ups covers the case for the vest itself.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

Weighted Vest vs Dip Belt

These two tools overlap less than the marketing suggests. The vest wins whenever your torso needs to stay free of a hanging load. The belt wins the moment the bar gets heavy.

Criterion Adjustable plate vest Fixed weighted vest Dip belt
Load range Wide, in steps Locked at purchase Very wide, limited by your plates
Increment Good, 1 to 5 lb None Excellent, 2.5 lb per plate
Pull-up comfort Fine with a short cut Hit or miss Shoulders completely free
Push-ups and core Excellent Excellent Unusable
Running and circuits Good if cinched tight Good Avoid
Best for Mixed training One use, tight budget Heavy pulls and dips

Past roughly 45 lb (20 kg) of added load, the vest stops being practical: the shell gets bulky, the weight sits high, and your shoulders pay for it. That is where the dip belt takes over. For push-ups it is the reverse, there is no belt option at all, so build that work with the weighted push-up program.

For structured progressions, the weighted dip program covers your first loaded blocks on the bars, and the weighted muscle-up program shows you how to carry a load through the most technical lift in streetlifting.

Running in a Weighted Vest: What the Research Shows

This is the most common request and the most misguided one. Thirteen trained trail runners were tested on a treadmill with vests at 0, 5 and 10 percent of body mass, roughly 7 lb (3.1 kg) and 14 lb (6.3 kg) for that group. Time to exhaustion dropped 2.5 percent at the 5 percent load and 6.0 percent at the 10 percent load. Martínez-Noguera et al., Sports, 2024.

You run shorter for a higher perceived effort. That is useful for a deliberate, short conditioning piece. It is counterproductive if you are training for a distance, and it stacks impact on joints that are already absorbing more. If strength is the goal, keep the vest for pushing and pulling, not for the road.

Mistakes to Avoid Before You Order

  • Buying for the max load. You will spend most of your time in the bottom third of the range. Check the increment first.
  • Using a running cut on the bar. Long shells ride up when you hang, every single time.
  • Skipping the adaptation phase. Two to three weeks light before you add plates, especially if your midline has never been loaded.
  • Loading before you own the movement. Until your bodyweight pull-ups are strict for 8 reps, a vest just cements a technical fault.
  • Ignoring the neck. A loose vest hits you on every dynamic rep. Cinch it, test it empty, then load it.

Run your first session with the vest on three rules: light load, full range of motion, same set count as usual. Add weight next session only if every rep stayed clean from the first to the last.

Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it:

mathieu

mathieu

Street workout athlete since 2019, I discovered streetlifting in 2023. Today I share my passion for the sport through streetliftings.com.

]]>
Anatomy of a Streetlifting Total: What Really Separates Athletes https://www.streetliftings.com/anatomy-streetlifting-total-data/ https://www.streetliftings.com/anatomy-streetlifting-total-data/#respond Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:00:03 +0000 https://www.streetliftings.com/anatomy-streetlifting-total-data/
Chart comparing each movement's share of the total with its share of the gap between athletes

The squat accounts for half of a streetlifting total. It is the heaviest movement, the one that takes up the most training time, and the one everyone talks about. Yet it is not what separates athletes from one another.

This analysis covers 444 complete performances from 13 French competitions held in 2025 and 2026, published as open data on data.gouv.fr. It answers one question: which of the four movements actually explains the gap between athletes.

What the data shows
Performances analysed444 (valid, all four movements recorded)
Squat share of the total51.3%
Muscle-up share of the total4.7%
Most unequal movement between athletesthe muscle-up
Top quarter vs bottom quarter, on the muscle-up×2.47

What a total is made of

Averaged over the 444 performances analysed, a total breaks down as follows. Note that the figures are added loads, on top of bodyweight, except on the squat where the bar carries the entire load.

MovementAverage share of totalStandard deviationMedianObserved range
Squat51.3%5.7 points50.4%38.6 to 78.7%
Dips27.3%3.3 points27.7%13.6 to 35.7%
Pull-ups16.8%2.5 points16.9%7.6 to 24.5%
Muscle-up4.7%2.1 points5.0%0 to 10.2%

The ranking itself surprises no one: the squat recruits the most powerful muscle groups and therefore carries the heaviest loads. The typical ratios between movements are strikingly consistent: a competitor lifts a median of 1.80 times more on squat than on dips, 1.63 times more on dips than on pull-ups, and 3.36 times more on pull-ups than on muscle-up.

A remarkably stable breakdown

The striking finding is not the ranking, it is its stability. Half of all competitors place between 47.2% and 54.5% of their total on the squat. For dips the range is tighter still: 25.5% to 29.4%.

In other words, competitive streetlifting does not really produce an "upper-body specialist" profile set against a "squat specialist" profile. Athletes resemble each other far more than one would expect in the way they build a total. Extreme cases exist, up to 78.7% of the total on the squat, but they are exceptions, usually the mark of a partly failed day on the other movements.

This has a direct consequence: if the breakdown barely varies, then changing your breakdown is not how you move up the rankings. Raising the whole thing is. The question is where the leverage lies.

Women and men do not build the same total

The average breakdown hides a clear difference between the sexes.

MovementWomen (100 perf.)Men (344 perf.)Gap
Squat58.1%49.3%+8.8 points
Dips23.5%28.4%-4.9 points
Pull-ups14.5%17.4%-2.9 points
Muscle-up3.9%5.0%-1.1 point

Among women the squat carries close to six tenths of the total, against barely half among men. The explanation lies in the nature of the movements: on dips, pull-ups and muscle-up the athlete first moves their own body and only adds a supplementary load, whereas on the squat the bar carries everything. The three upper-body movements therefore produce mechanically smaller added loads, and the effect is more pronounced for women.

En 1 minute

Programme ou coaching ?
Trouve ton format idéal

Réponds à 4 questions et reçois une recommandation personnalisée selon ton niveau et tes objectifs.

Faire le quiz →
1 min chrono Résultat sur-mesure Gratuit

The heavier the class, the more the squat dominates

The same pattern shows up within each sex, class by class.

Weight classSquatDipsPull-upsMuscle-up
Women -52 kg54.1%25.3%15.3%5.3%
Women -57 kg57.2%23.1%15.2%4.5%
Women -63 kg59.1%23.2%14.3%3.5%
Women -70 kg61.3%22.3%13.9%2.5%
Men -66 kg47.6%28.3%18.4%5.8%
Men -73 kg49.2%28.4%17.3%5.1%
Men -80 kg48.8%28.2%17.9%5.1%
Men -87 kg50.3%28.6%16.6%4.4%
Men -94 kg49.6%28.7%17.2%4.5%
Men -101 kg53.7%27.5%15.7%3.1%

The progression is steady among women: from 54.1% squat at -52 kg to 61.3% at -70 kg, while the muscle-up share is cut in half. Among men, the lighter classes are the most well-rounded, with 18.4% pull-ups and 5.8% muscle-up at -66 kg, against 15.7% and 3.1% at -101 kg.

None of this is surprising: the heavier the bodyweight, the costlier it is to move it, and the smaller the added load on bodyweight movements becomes in proportion. The squat, on the other hand, benefits from size.

What actually separates athletes

Here is the heart of the matter. Weighing heavily in the total and making the difference are two different things. To measure the second, we break down the spread in level between athletes of the same weight class, and look at how much of that spread each movement explains.

MovementShare of totalShare of the gap between athletesReading
Squat51.3%42.0%weighs more than it separates
Dips27.3%30.7%separates slightly more than it weighs
Pull-ups16.8%16.7%balanced
Muscle-up4.7%10.6%separates twice as much as it weighs

The squat is the common foundation: everyone trains it, everyone lifts a lot on it, and the gaps there stay relatively contained. The muscle-up, by contrast, makes up only a twentieth of the total yet explains more than a tenth of the differences in level at equal bodyweight. Relative to its weight, it is the most discriminating of the four.

The muscle-up, the most unequal movement

The spread of loads confirms it beyond doubt. Within a single weight class, the relative gap between athletes is:

MovementSpread at equal bodyweight
Squat14.5%
Pull-ups20.7%
Dips21.1%
Muscle-up56.0%

Now compare the top quarter of the field with the bottom quarter, athletes ranked by their relative strength index.

MovementTop quarterBottom quarterRatio
Squat206.6 kg151.3 kg×1.37
Dips120.0 kg78.9 kg×1.52
Pull-ups73.1 kg48.9 kg×1.49
Muscle-up25.6 kg10.4 kg×2.47
Total425.1 kg289.4 kg×1.47

The best lift 37% more than the rest on the squat, but nearly two and a half times more on the muscle-up. It is also the only movement whose share of the total rises markedly with level: 6.0% in the top quarter against 3.5% in the bottom quarter, while the squat share falls from 53.3% to 49.1%.

One point of honesty is due. In absolute terms the largest gap remains the squat: 55 kg between the two quarters, against 15 kg on the muscle-up. A kilo is a kilo, whichever movement it comes from. What these figures show is that the muscle-up is the least evenly mastered movement, and therefore the one where most competitors still hold the largest relative room to improve.

What this changes in training

Three lessons emerge, to be taken for what they are: statistical findings about a population of competitors, not a personal prescription.

The squat remains essential, but it will not set you apart. It carries half the total and must be trained accordingly. It is simply that, at equal bodyweight, most competitors sit within a narrow band. Pouring extra effort into it yields diminishing returns in ranking terms.

Dips deserve better than their reputation. Second contributor to the total and second source of separation, they offer an attractive ratio between training volume invested and kilos gained on the total.

The muscle-up is the movement not to neglect. It is the most technical of the four, the one demanding the most coordination, and that is precisely why the gaps there are so wide. An athlete stuck at 10 kg while rivals carry 25 loses far more than the 15 kg on the scoresheet: they lose the most accessible room to improve in their whole total.

These imbalances are corrected by programming that treats the four movements as one system rather than four separate workouts. That is the approach behind our streetlifting training programs, built around the logic of the total.

Method, data and reuse

The analysis covers the 444 performances for which all four movements are recorded and the performance was validated, out of the 497 rows in the dataset. Failed performances and incomplete result sheets are excluded, without which the calculated shares would be meaningless.

The "share of the gap between athletes" is obtained by decomposing the variance of totals within each weight class holding at least ten performances, then averaging across the ten classes retained. Working within classes is essential: comparing a -66 kg athlete to a -101 kg athlete would mostly measure a difference in size.

The source data is freely downloadable from data.gouv.fr under the Open Licence 2.0, together with its data dictionary and a full account of known quality limitations: Streetlifting in France, competition results 2025-2026. It covers 13 competitions, from regional meets to the French national championship, and athletes are pseudonymised.

For an introduction to the discipline itself, its rules and its movements, see our complete guide to streetlifting.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Nous n'avons pas pu confirmer votre inscription.
Votre inscription est confirmée.

Newsletter

Inscrivez-vous à notre newsletter pour suivre nos actualités.

]]>
https://www.streetliftings.com/anatomy-streetlifting-total-data/feed/ 0